In accordance with Annex II, Part 2, Point 42 the credit quality step shall be adjusted to the maturity or recommended holding period of the PRIIP. Should the maturity to be used for this adjustment b
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-08-18
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
What aspects should be considered by the manufacturer when determining the RHP of a PRIIP? In accordance with Article 8(3)(g)(ii) of the Regulation and Articles 2(5) and 6 of the Delegated Regulation,
Answered 2019-04-04
According to the PRIIPs Delegated Regulation, if the MRM class changes to a different MRM class, the PRIIP manufacturer shall attribute the corresponding MRM class to the MRM class which the PRIIP has
Answered 2025-05-05
Key information document (KID), Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)
Answered 2025-12-02
Key information document (KID)
Answered 2024-04-08
Point 15 of Annex IV of the Delegated Regulation states that for Category 2 PRIIPs for which there is not an appropriate benchmark with sufficient history, performance scenarios shall be calculated in
Answered 2022-11-14
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.