Can an appropriate benchmark or proxy continue to be used once sufficient data becomes available?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-08-18
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
When sufficient history for the SRI calculation is not available to cover 5 years of data for a daily share class, can the PRIIP manufacturer decide to use a benchmark/proxy to cover up to 5 years of
Answered 2024-03-15
In assessing whether the use of a particular benchmark or proxy is appropriate, potential assets in which the PRIIP invests, consistent with the investment policy, must be taken into account (point 16
Answered 2025-12-05
How should the requirement to use data of an appropriate benchmark/proxy be interpreted where there is no, or insufficient, price data for the PRIIP or the underlying value. For example: - Would an op
Answered 2017-07-04
Could an artificially created “synthetic” proxy be considered an appropriate proxy in accordance with the PRIIPs RTS Annex II and Annex IV?
Answered 2024-03-15
Point 12 of Annex IV of the Delegated Regulation notes that where the objectives of the PRIIP make reference to a benchmark, that benchmark shall be used for the performance scenario calculations. How
Answered 2022-11-14
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.