Does point 5(b) of Article 2 of the RTS – ‘an indication of whether the PRIIP manufacturer is entitled to terminate the PRIIP unilaterally’ concern i) market circumstances or ii) client specific circu
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2024-03-15
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
The new wording in Article 2(2a)(b) of the ‘What is this product?’ section appears to duplicate the requirement already included in the RTS Article 6 (in the “How long should I hold it and can I take
Answered 2024-03-15
What aspects should be considered by the manufacturer when determining the RHP of a PRIIP? In accordance with Article 8(3)(g)(ii) of the Regulation and Articles 2(5) and 6 of the Delegated Regulation,
Answered 2019-04-04
The main difference between Category 2 and Category 3 is, in accordance with Annex II Part 1 Point 5, whether the condition of "constant multiple" is fulfilled. In the event where a UCITs product has:
Answered 2025-12-05
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)
Answered 2025-12-02
Is a financial counter-incentive which is triggered in case of a default of a borrower on certain specific contractual obligations considered as an incentive to redeem?
Answered 2021-09-24
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.