Third-party advice by independent contractors not authorised as CASPs under Article 62(2)(q) of the MiCA Regulation
- Regulation
- MiCA
- Article
- Third-party advice by independent contractors not authorised as CASPs under Article 62(2)(q) of the MiCA Regulation
- Topic
- Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP)
- Submitted
- 2026-04-06
Question
This Q&A is published by European Securities and Markets Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Tied agents under MiCA
Answered 2024-09-12
Proprietary trading under MICA
Answered 2025-06-06
Perimeter of advice under MiCA compared to MiFID II
Answered 2026-06-18
CASPs providing services based on an Article 60 notification
Answered 2024-09-12
Crypto-Asset lending services under MiCA
Answered 2026-06-18
More Q&As on this topic
Crypto-Asset lending services under MiCA
Answered 2026-06-18
Perimeter of advice under MiCA compared to MiFID II
Answered 2026-06-18
Overlap between offers of crypto-assets and placing
Answered 2026-02-18
Clarification on Withdrawal Requirements under Article 75 of MiCA for CASPs
Answered 2026-02-18
Payouts in fiat currency by CASPs in the context of exchange services
Answered 2026-02-18
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.