ESMA · ESMA_QA_1984 Answer Published
CFDs referencing futures
- Regulation
- Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 - Investor Protection and Intermediaries
- Article
- ESMA Decision 2018/795; ESMA Decision 2019/796
- Topic
- Product intervention
- Submitted
- 2018-06-01
- Answered
- 2018-06-01
Question
Why are CFDs referencing futures contracts not separately identified in Annex I to the CFD Decision to temporarily restrict contracts for differences in the Union in accordance with Article 40 of MiFIR?
Answer
[ESMA 35-36-1262 Q&AS on Product intervention, Q&A nr 5.7] Annex I to the ESMA CFD Decision sets out the different initial margin percentages by type of underlying. The different types of underlyings do not explicitly refer to CFDs referencing futures contracts. Nevertheless, as futures also give the holder an exposure to a specific underlying this specific underlying should be considered for the purpose of the ESMA CFD Decision. For example, the minimum initial margin percentage for a CFD on a future on the USD/EUR pair is 3.33% of the notional value of the CFD. For this purpose ESMA considers a CFD on the future on the USD/EUR to have a type of underlying that is a major currency.
This Q&A is published by European Securities and Markets Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Treatment of contracts for difference under Article 327(1) or Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Answered 2014-12-19
Various underlyings listed in Annex I, Section C(10) of MIFID II?
Answered 2022-09-23
Rolling spot forex
Answered 2018-09-28
Clarification of the treatment of contracts for difference (CFD)
Answered 2019-11-29
Securitised derivatives
Answered 2018-07-30
More Q&As on this topic
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.