ESMA · ESMA_QA_1634 Answer Published

Trading venue and co-location

Regulation
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets
Topic
Multilateral and bilateral systems
Submitted
2017-01-31
Answered
2017-01-31

Question

Would a trading venue locating its electronic systems on a third party data centre be required to comply with the co-location provisions under RTS 10 even where the venue is not providing the co-location service?

Answer

[ESMA 70-872942901-38 MiFID II MiFIR market structures Q&A, Q&A 5.2] The principle underpinning Article 1 of RTS 10 is to ensure that electronic access to trading venues is fair and based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria. A trading venue should seek to ensure that this principle is not violated even when the connectivity service is provided by a third-party to members, participants or a client of the trading venue. Therefore, the trading venue should take all the necessary steps to ensure that the third party proximity hosting service provider offers a fair and non-discriminatory access to all members/participants/clients of the trading venue subscribing to such services. Such a requirement may include the conclusion or amendment of an agreement between the trading venue and the service provider so as to remain fully compliant with the provisions in RTS 10.

This Q&A is published by European Securities and Markets Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.