ESMA · ESMA_QA_1341 Answer Published

Redemption Date

Regulation
Securitisation Regulation (EU) 2017/2402
Topic
Securitisation Disclosure Templates
Submitted
2019-11-15
Answered
2019-11-15

Question

How should the ‘Redemption Date’ field be completed for active and inactive underlying exposures? (RREL9; CREL11; CRPL9; AUTL9; CMRL9; LESL9; ESTL9)

Answer

[ESMA 33-128-563 Securitisation Q&A, Q&A 5.3.3] In the event that an underlying exposure is an active underlying exposure as defined in the RTS on disclosure, then the Redemption Date field should be completed with ‘ND5’. This is because the underlying exposure has not been redeemed nor has completed had a recovery process completed. In the event that an underlying exposure is an inactive underlying exposure as defined in the RTS on disclosure, the Redemption Date field should be completed in the following manner: If the underlying exposure has been redeemed (i.e. fully paid back as set out in the contractual terms of the underlying exposure, including prepayments), then the Redemption Date field should be completed with the date at which the redemption occurred. If the underlying exposure has defaulted and the recovery process is now completed, then the Redemption Date field should be completed with the date at which the recovery process was completed. In all other cases for the underlying exposure becoming inactive (e.g. repurchases, substitutions, etc.), the Redemption Date field should be completed with ‘ND5’.

This Q&A is published by European Securities and Markets Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.