ESMA · ESMA_QA_1316 Answer Published

Annex 2: Underlying Exposures - Residential Real Estate - Pari Passu Underlying Exposures RREL32

Regulation
Securitisation Regulation (EU) 2017/2402
Topic
Securitisation Disclosure Templates
Submitted
2020-10-05
Answered
2020-10-05

Question

(a) How should this field be filled in if an obligor has two underlying exposure parts ranking pari passu? (b) Does the field “Pari Passu Underlying Exposures” include any other exposures to the obligor or only other exposures relating to the property whose mortgage is included in the pool? If for example, there were an owner-occupied mortgage in an SPV pool and the obligor had a separate buy-to-let mortgage on a different property that was not included in the SPV pool, would it be expected to include the value of both loans in this field?

Answer

[ESMA 33-128-563 Securitisation Q&A, Q&A 5.4.2] (a) This field should contain the total value of underlying exposures to this obligor ranking pari passu with this underlying exposure (regardless of whether or not they are included in this pool). If there are no balances ranking pari passu, enter 0. For example, if an obligor has two loans ranking pari passu, loan A of € 60,000 and loan B € 40,000, then the correct amount for this field would be € 100,000. (b) This field relates to any other exposure to the obligor. Consequently, the Buy-To-Let mortgage in the example should be included in this field.

This Q&A is published by European Securities and Markets Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.