ESMA · ESMA_QA_1313 Answer Published

Reporting of Geographic Region fields

Regulation
Securitisation Regulation (EU) 2017/2402
Topic
Securitisation Disclosure Templates
Submitted
2021-05-28
Answered
2021-05-28

Question

(a) NUTS3 code entered for the fields “Geographic Region - Obligor (RREL11, CREL12…etc.)” is accompanied with the “Geographic Region Classification” to identify the exact NUTS code whereas this is not the case for the “Geographic Region – Collateral” in the relevant asset classes. (b) How can one enter the year of the NUTS3 classification used for the graphic region fields in RREL12 (Geographic Region Classification) when all underlying exposures are located outside the Union and no NUTS3 codes are used, only third-country codes such as “AUZZZ” are entered into RREL11 (Geographical Region – Obligor)? (c) Should field geographic fields such as RREL11 always be populated with data from the primary borrower or are we allowed to apply a business rule like for example if the primary borrower is outside of the Union and the second borrower in the Union we are allowed to report the NUTS code of the second borrower here?

Answer

[ESMA 33-128-563 Securitisation Q&A, Q&A 5.2.1] (a) As per the description of the Geographic Region Classification field, “All geographic region fields must use the same classification consistently for each underlying exposure and across all underlying exposures in the data submission.” Insofar as collateral is provided for the underlying exposures, then the same classification reported for the underlying exposure fields (e.g. in field RREL11) should be extended and used for the collateral fields (e.g. in field RREC6). (b) In this case, any year may be entered into this field. However, as soon as a single obligor or collateral is included in the pool which is located in a location with an eligible NUTS code, this field must be updated to reflect the relevant classification. (c) The geographic region fields should be populated with information relating to the primary obligor in case of multiple obligors (see also Q&A 1314). This is still the case where the main obligor is located outside the Union and a secondary obligor is located inside the Union.

This Q&A is published by European Securities and Markets Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.