EIOPA · 811

811

Regulation
Guidelines on loss-absorbing capacity of technical provisions and deferred taxes
Submitted
2016-10-26
Answered
2019-10-16

Question

Did the formula, calculating the net SCR of groups, take into account the possibility of having a situation where solo undertakings have a gross SCR which is smaller than the net SCR? Both factors:[grossSCR(solo;sub-module) - netSCR(solo;sub-module)]and[grossSCR(solo) - netSCR(solo)]can have a negative outcome and can lead to strange results. It seems logic to take for each of these factors the maximum with 0.

Answer

The formula in Guideline 17 does not take situations into account where solo undertakings have a gross SCR which is smaller than the net SCR. The factor with [grossSCR(solo) - netSCR(solo)] in the denominator should indeed be subject to a maximum function with zero: if grossSCR(solo) < netSCR(solo), then there is no LAC TP at solo level, the factor should be set to 0 to take this into account. Nevertheless the factor with the component [grossSCR(solo;sub-module) - netSCR(solo;sub-module)] should not be subject to a maximum function with zero: if grossSCR(solo) > netSCR(solo), but grossSCR(solo;sub-module) < netSCR(solo;sub-module), then this sub-module decreases the difference between the gross SCR(solo) and the net SCR(solo). To apply a maximum function on the sub-module component would unduly nullify this decrease at group level.

This Q&A is published by European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.