EIOPA · 2680
Other
- Regulation
- Guidelines on ring-fenced funds
- Topic
- Other
- Submitted
- 2023-06-08
- Answered
- 2025-03-28
Question
As part of my academic program, I am working on a research paper that explores the advantages and disadvantages of protected cell captives (PCCs) in the insurance industry. During my extensive research on the topic, I have encountered challenges in finding up-to-date information regarding Solvency requirements in relation with Protected Cell Companies. As Malta allows the establishment of PCCs under its insurance legislation, there needs to be a regulatory framework. Considering the importance of Solvency II in the insurance sector and its potential impact on PCCs, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide me with any recent information, guidelines, or documents pertaining to the intersection of PCCs and Solvency II. It would be particularly helpful to receive any materials that reflect the current regulatory framework and any specific considerations or requirements that apply to PCCs under Solvency II.
Answer
This question has been rejected because it does not relate to the consistent and effective application of the legal framework covered by this Q&A process. Please submit generic questions to infoeiopa [dot] europa [dot] eu (info[at]eiopa[dot]europa[dot]eu).
This Q&A is published by European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.