EIOPA · 2427
Reporting Templates
- Regulation
- (EU) No 2015/35 - supplementing Dir 2009/138/EC - taking up & pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (SII)
- Article
- 5(2)
- Topic
- Reporting Templates
- Submitted
- 2022-04-21
- Answered
- 2023-04-21
Question
The answer on Q2154 says that CQS should be „derived from the rating of the asset or from the rating of the issuer “.
But it might happen that CQS of issuer can be different than CQS of asset, e.g. if the asset is managed/held by some asset management company.
Example: DE government bond might have CQS 1, but it is held as investment of some fund whose CQS is 5. Although the bond has the high quality, in case of default of the fund (asset management company) also the insurer will have a loss. Therefore the input information to SCR calculation should be worse CQS, i.e. the CQS of asset management company and not the CQS of asset issuer (in this example 5 instead of 1)
Shouldn’t answer clearly say that the CQS of the asset holder should be filled in, instead of the CQS of issuer?
Background
Ref. To QUESTION ID 2154
Answer
This question has been rejected because the issue it deals with is already addressed in Article 5(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35.
This Q&A is published by European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
More Q&As on this topic
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.