EIOPA · 2242

Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)

Regulation
(EU) No 2015/35 - supplementing Dir 2009/138/EC - taking up & pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (SII)
Article
120 (and 121, 122, 123, 124, 125)
Topic
Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)
Submitted
2021-01-22
Answered
2021-07-07

Question

According to the EIOPA Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 (Article 120) and Annex XIII, the capital requirement for natural catastrophe sub-modules in regions other than those set out in Annex XIII should be calculated based on premiums. In the view of Brexit, should an undertaking calculate the natural catastrophe risk capital for the United Kingdom based on the Premium or Sum insured? Could you please also advise if the United Kingdom should be treated differently than other EU members for the Non-life catastrophe risk sub-module (article 119) in the view of the EIOPA paper (EIOPA-BoS-18/201 18 May 2018, “Opinion on the solvency position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union”)?

Background

EIOPA paper (EIOPA-BoS-18/201 18 May 2018, “Opinion on the solvency position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union”)

Answer

Question: According to the EIOPA Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 (Article 120) and Annex XIII, the capital requirement for natural catastrophe sub-modules in regions other than those set out in Annex XIII should be calculated based on premiums. In the view of Brexit, should an undertaking calculate the natural catastrophe risk capital for the United Kingdom based on the Premium or Sum insured? A: The natural catastrophe risk capital for the United Kingdom should be based on the sum insured. The methodology using the sum insured as input is also valid for countries which are not EU Member States such as Switzerland.Could you please also advise if the United Kingdom should be treated differently than other EU members for the Non-life catastrophe risk sub-module (article 119) in the view of the EIOPA paper (EIOPA-BoS-18/201 18 May 2018, “Opinion on the solvency position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union”)?A: No the UK should not be treated differently for the Non-life catastrophe risk sub-module.

This Q&A is published by European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.