EBA · 2026_7720 Rejected question

Inconsistencies Between ITS Templates and DPM 4.2 Annotated Table Layouts for RESOL 1/2

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
11, para. 1
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2026-02-16

Question

When inconsistencies exist between the ITS templates and the DPM 4.2 Annotated Table Layouts, which source should be considered authoritative for reporting purposes?

Background

We have identified inconsistencies between the ITS templates published in the "Annex for IT solutions instructions disclaimer" and the "Annotated Table Layout RES 4.2 RESOL1/2" available in the DPM 4.2, and would appreciate clarification on the correct approach to follow. These inconsistencies have been identified in RESOL 1 and are expected to affect RESOL 2 as well. Specific examples of discrepancies include: • Country/Currency codes : The ITS templates require ISO codes (e.g., ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 for countries), while the DPM specifies full names. • Boolean values : The ITS templates specify YES/NO, while the DPM requires TRUE/FALSE. • Formatting requirements : The DPM validations contain additional spacing and naming conventions that differ from the ITS specifications.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2026_7720

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.