EBA · 2025_7668 Rejected question

Inconsistency between the report DPM table layout and data point categorization 4.2 and EBA Annex II Instructions.

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
Annex II.15 Z 07.01.3 FUNC 1 PAY and Annex II.13 Z 07.01. FUNC 1 CM, para. 20251119 Annoted Table Layout RES 4,2 RESOL2RES 4,2
Topic
Resolution plans
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2025-12-19

Question

'- In the DPM 4,2 file in tab Z_07.01.3 a and c, the fields 0100 (Number of transactions) and 0110 (Number of clients) are the components of the Cross Border Activities section. In the Annex II Instructions, the fields 0100 and 0110 are not subject to the Cross Border Activities section but they concern the number of clients and transactions of the total economic function.  - In the DPM 4,2 file in tab Z_07.01.4, the fields 0090 (Number of counterparties) and 0100 (Number of transactions) are the components of the Cross Border Values section. In the Annex II Instructions, the fields 0100 and 0110 are not subject to the Cross Border Values section but they concern the total numbers of the total economic function.  Could you please confirm that the breakdowns in the tabs: Z_07.01.3a for the column 0100, Z_07.01.3c for the column 0110, Z_07.01.4  for the columns 0090 and 0100 are not included in the Cross Border section?

Background

Our question concerns the techical file DMP 4.2 in the tab Z_07.01.3 a,c and tab Z_07.01.4 in which we found an inconsistency with the instructions.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2025_7668

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.