EBA · 2025_7401 Rejected question

Interaction between CRR3 article 124 and article 193

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
124, para. 1
Topic
Credit risk
Submitted by
Accounting firm
Submitted
2025-04-07

Question

When should an IPRE exposure be riskweighted at 150% according to CRR3 article 124 para 1 (b)?

Background

We are seeking clarification on the interaction between article 124 para 1 (a) and (b) and article 193 para 1. According to CRR3 para 4 (75b) an IPRE exposure must be secured on real estate (either RRE or CRE). Further according to article 124 1 (b) an IPRE exposure shall be assigned a riskweight of 150% and according to CRR3 article 124 para 1 (a) a non-IPRE exposure must be risk weighted as an exposure without collateral (typically risk weight of 100%). Article 124 para 1 (b) therefore seems to be in violation with CRR3 article 193 para 1 where it says the following: "No exposure in respect of which an institution obtains credit risk mitigation shall produce a higher risk-weighted exposure amount or expected loss amount than an otherwise identical exposure in respect of which an institution has no credit risk mitigation".
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2025_7401

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.