EBA · 2024_7213 Final Q&A

Applying risk weight in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
235, para. 3
Topic
Credit risk
Submitted by
Individual
Submitted
2024-10-07
Answered
2025-07-04
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

In case of exposure and guarantee denominated in different currencies, which currency shall be taken into account in the process of application of risk weight for guaranteed part of exposure in accordance with Article 235(3) of CRR3?

Background

In Regulation (Eu) 2024/1623 Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 31 May 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor ("CRR3”) Article 235 paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:  “3. Institutions may extend the preferential treatment set out in Article 114(4) and (7), to exposures or parts of exposures guaranteed by the central government or the central bank as if those exposures were direct exposures to the central government or the central bank, provided that the conditions set out in Article 114(4) or (7), as applicable, are met for such direct exposures”. In accordance with Article 114 paragraphs 4 and 7 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 ("CRR”) institution should verify if currency of the exposure to central government (or central bank) is denominated and funded in the domestic currency of that central government (or central bank). In case when currency of the guarantee is different from currency of the exposure, it is not clear which currency should be taken into consideration under CRR3 rules. To obtain risk weight equal 0%, should guarantee be denominated in currency of the central government and should direct exposure be funded in currency of that exposure?  We believe that only in that situation foreign exchange risk of the institution will be mitigated. Moreover, currency mismatch between guarantee and direct exposure will be covered by appropriate FX haircut in accordance with Article 233 paragraph 3 of CRR.

Answer

Article 235(3) CRR requires for extending the preferential treatment set out in Article 114(4) or (7) CRR that the conditions in Article 114(4) or (7) CRR would be met if the guaranteed exposures or parts of exposures were direct exposures to the central government or central bank. Consequently, the relevant currency for assessing these conditions is the domestic currency of the central government or central bank providing the unfunded credit protection because this determines the currency for the treatment as if this was a direct exposure to the central government or central bank. Therefore, the unfunded credit protection has to be denominated in this currency, and the protected amount has to be funded in that same currency. Furthermore, where the guarantee is denominated in a currency other than that of the guaranteed exposure, the resulting currency mismatch shall be addressed in accordance with Article 233(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR).

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2024_7213

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.