EBA · 2023_6913 Rejected question

Admissible values to {C34.06, c0040}

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
chapter 6
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2023-10-18
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

According to XBRL rule v10236_a: [C 34.06 (All rows)] {C 34.06, c0040} in {[eba_CT:x10], [eba_CT:x1], [eba_CT:x12], [eba_CT:x598], [eba_CT:x599], [eba_CT:x20]}. On the other hand, "DPM table layout and Datapoint categorization" file available at EBA website, the admissible values are: (CT:x10) Central banks; (CT:x1) General governments;  (CT:x12) Credit institutions;  (CT:x18) Financial corporations other than credit institutions; (CT:x598) Financial corporations other than credit institutions and investment firms; (CT:x599) Investment firms; (CT:x20) Non-financial corporations; (CT:x5) Households.  The EBA xbrl validation rule does not include (CT:x18) "Financial corporations other than credit institutions" nor (CT:x5) "Households". This mismatch has been caused validations warnings. Could you, please, clarify which admissible values should be considered for {C34.06,c0040} ?

Background

The validation rule v10236_a does not include all the admissible values presented in "DPM table layout and Datapoint categorization" available in EBA website ( https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/document_library... )
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2023_6913

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Inconsistency in validation rules v0532_m.

Answered 2014-04-04

C 09.04, row 010, column 010 – Exposure value under the standardised approach for relevant credit exposures

Answered 2017-02-03

Discrepancies between annotated table layout and EBA validation rules (e.g. v5351_m)

Answered 2018-10-05

Validations

Answered 2014-08-22

C 41.00 - Inconsistency between Validations and EBA member/dimension types causes validation v0668_m to fail

Answered 2017-02-03

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.