Inclusion of short term deposits in third country credit institutions as liquid assets

The answer is drafted considering the case of short-term deposits held at a credit institution that is located in a third country. In accordance with Article 43(1) of the IFR, investment firms shall hold an amount of liquid assets equivalent to at least one third of their fixed overhead requirement. Article 43(1), point (d), of the IFR specifies that, for the purpose of the liquidity requirement, unencumbered short-term deposits at a credit institution qualify as a liquid asset. The definition of a credit institution set out in Article 4(1), point (8), of the IFR refers to the definition in Article 4(1), point (1), of the CRR. This definition is based on certain activities that an undertaking needs to perform to qualify as a “credit institution”; the location of the undertaking is not one of the criteria determining whether an undertaking qualifies as a “credit institution”. This implies that unencumbered short-term deposits held at credit institutions located in a third-country could also qualify as liquid assets. However, an asset will generally be considered as liquid if it can be made readily available in times of stress without unduly affecting its market price. In the context of short-term deposits, these conditions could be translated in the capacity for an investment firm to withdraw the needed amount of short-term deposits at any time in periods of stress without significant costs such as in relation to any currency conversion. This required timely availability explains why short-term deposits should be unencumbered. In the context of third country credit institutions, such capacity could be additionally constrained by factors not limited to differences in time zones and in currencies. Those elements should also therefore be considered when assessing whether short-term deposits held with third country credit institutions could validly qualify as liquid assets. This assessment is to be made by investment firms and their supervisory authorities as part of the processes laid down in Articles 24 and 36 of Directive (EU) 2019/2034. The answers clarify provisions already contained in the applicable legislation. They do not extend in any way the rights and obligations deriving from such legislation nor do they introduce any additional requirements for the concerned operators and competent authorities. The answers are merely intended to assist natural or legal persons, including competent authorities and Union institutions and bodies in clarifying the application or implementation of the relevant legal provisions. Only the Court of Justice of the European Union is competent to authoritatively interpret Union law. The views expressed in the internal Commission Decision cannot prejudge the position that the European Commission might take before the Union and national courts.