Contingency Measures under Article 33
- Regulation
- Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
- Article
- 97
- Topic
- Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
- Submitted by
- Other
- Submitted
- 2019-12-19
- Answered
- 2021-04-23
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Question
Background
Answer
Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2019_5054
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Scope of contingency mechanism
Answered 2020-06-19
Eligibility of communication by AISPs with ASPSP throughout two access interfaces in parallel
Answered 2024-03-22
Revocation of ASPSP's Exemption from the Contingency Mechanism due to Prolonged Service Disruption
Answered 2024-09-27
What is considered as a dedicated interface
Answered 2019-08-09
Communication plans to inform payment service providers making use of the dedicated interface
Answered 2019-02-08
More Q&As on this topic
Definition of "equivalent authentication procedure" for journeys initiated from a mobile application
Answered 2026-06-12
Obstacle assessment of a mandatory client segment selection screen in a redirection journey
Answered 2026-06-12
Clarification of the scope of the term "authentication procedures" in the context of the RTS and the EBA Opinion on obstacles
Answered 2026-06-12
SCA exception for Contactless only terminals (SoftPOS) in case of emergency
Answered 2025-10-03
the use of strong and widely recognized encryption techniques
Answered 2025-10-03
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.