Clarification of negative RWA--, Annex III, Benchmarking exercise
- Regulation
- Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
- Article
- 78, para. 2
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
- Submitted by
- Credit institution
- Submitted
- 2019-01-14
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Question
Background
Answer
Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2019_4459
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements included in RWAs and interaction with validation rule v3689_s in template C5.01.
Answered 2019-07-12
EBA Benchmarking 2016
Answered 2016-12-02
Adjustments to RWA for DTA related to timing differences due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements in template C5.01.
Answered 2022-02-04
PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+
Answered 2020-11-27
Interaction between benchmarking and additional capital requirements under Article 458 of CRR
Answered 2017-03-24
More Q&As on this topic
Weighted average of the CCF
Answered 2020-11-27
PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+
Answered 2020-11-27
Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types
Answered 2019-07-26
Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight
Answered 2019-07-26
EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)
Answered 2019-07-26
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.