EBA · 2018_4427 Rejected question

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise 2019: RWA- and RWA --

Regulation
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Article
78
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2018-12-20
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

For the purpose of Template C103 institutions shall report RWA- and RWA--. According to the corresponding instructions (Annex IV), RWA- and RWA-- result from the application of PD- and PD-- (instead of the institution’s PD values). For this purpose, shall regulatory PD-floors as defined in art. 160 (1) and 163 (1) CRR be applied?

Background

Ensure clarity of instructions
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2018_4427

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+

Answered 2020-11-27

EBA Benchmarking 2016

Answered 2016-12-02

Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight

Answered 2019-07-26

Interaction between benchmarking and additional capital requirements under Article 458 of CRR

Answered 2017-03-24

CR IRB (C08.01 and C08.02) template column 010 and CR GB (C09.02) column 080

Answered 2016-01-29

More Q&As on this topic

Weighted average of the CCF

Answered 2020-11-27

PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+

Answered 2020-11-27

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types

Answered 2019-07-26

Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight

Answered 2019-07-26

EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)

Answered 2019-07-26

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.