- Regulation
- Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
- Article
- 98, para. 1
- Topic
- Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
- Submitted by
- Credit institution
- Submitted
- 2018-07-18
- Answered
- 2019-06-07
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Answer
In accordance with Article 33(6) of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 , one of the conditions that account servicing payment service providers (ASPSPs), who have opted for a dedicated interface, must meet in order to be eligible for an exemption from the fall-back mechanism under Article 36(4) of the Delegated Regulation is that their dedicated interface “has been designed and tested in accordance with Article 30(5) to the satisfaction of the payment service providers referred to therein” (Article 33(6)(b) of the Delegated Regulation). In accordance with Article 30(5) of the Delegated Regulation, ”Account servicing payment service providers shall make available a testing facility, including support, for connection and functional testing to enable authorised payment initiation service providers, payment service providers issuing card-based payment instruments and account information service providers, or payment service providers that have applied for the relevant authorisation, to test their software and applications used for offering a payment service to users. This testing facility should be made available no later than 6 months before the application date referred to in Article 38(2) or before the target date for the market launch of the access interface when the launch takes place after the date referred to in Article 38(2) […]” Furthermore, Guideline 6.5(b) of the EBA Guidelines on the conditions to be met to benefit from an exemption from contingency measures under Article 33(6) of Regulation (EU) 2018/389 (EBA/GL/2018/07) , provides that “The testing facility should allow ASPSPs, authorised Payment Initiation Service Providers (PISPs), Account Information Service Providers (AISPs) and card-based payment instrument issuers (CBPIIs) or payment service providers (PSPs) that have applied to their competent authorities for the relevant authorisation to test the dedicated interface in a secure, dedicated testing environment with non-real Payment Services User (PSU) data, for the following: [...] b. the ability of ASPSPs and authorised PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs to exchange the relevant certificates in accordance with Article 34 of the” Delegated Regulation. As clarified in the Final report on the above mentioned Guidelines, for the purpose of the testing under Article 30(5) of the Delegated Regulation, the testing facility should allow the testing of the ability of authorised AISPs, PISPs and CBPIIs to exchange eIDAS certificates as referred to in Article 34 of the Delegated Regulation. Prior to 14 September 2019, when certificates must comply with Article 34 of the Delegated Regulation, authorised or registered AISPs, PISPs or CBPIIs that do not yet have the relevant qualified certificate under Article 34 of the Delegated Regulation, may also use test certificates for the purpose of testing in accordance with Article 30(5) of the Delegated Regulation. PSPs that have applied to their competent authorities for the relevant authorisation/ registration as AISPs, PISPs or CBPIIs, but are not yet authorised, may identify themselves for the purpose of testing under Article 30(5) of the Delegated Regulation using test certificates, taking into account that said Article requires ASPSPs to also grant these providers access to the testing facility. This also applies to the period after the application date, 14 September 2019, of the Delegated Regulation.
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated
weekly from official ESA sources.