EBA · 2018_4035 Final Q&A

Criteria for the application of the transaction risk analysis (TRA) exemption – Application of the TRA exemption by authorized PSPs other than the issuer and the acquirer

Regulation
Directive 2015/2366/EU (PSD2)
Article
97
Topic
Strong customer authentication and common and secure communication (incl. access)
Submitted by
Other
Submitted
2018-06-28
Answered
2018-10-26
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

May an authorized PSP other than the issuer and acquirer apply the TRA exemption on the basis of its own fraud rate and risk analysis?

Background

The RTS allow PSPs to apply the TRA exemption. In the case of card transactions, this generically means that both issuers and acquirers are allowed to apply the TRA exemption. Card payments may involve other authorized PSPs in addition to the issuer and the acquirer. These can be, for example, wallet providers, gateways, or an acquirer’s subsidiary that is a separate legal entity from the parent acquirer and provides its acquiring services under its own PSD2 authorization. We believe that any authorized PSP that is involved in a card transaction should be allowed to apply the TRA exemption on the basis of its own fraud rates and risk analysis.

Answer

In accordance with Article 18 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 [RTS on Strong customer authentication and secure communication] “payment service providers shall be allowed not to apply strong customer authentication where the payer initiates a remote electronic payment transaction identified by the payment service provider as posing a low level of risk”. Table 2 (on page 9) of the EBA Opinion on the implementation of the RTS on Strong customer authentication and secure communication clarifies that either the payer’s or the payee’s payment service providers (PSP) may apply the transaction risk analysis exemption, taking into account the consequences of the requirements for liability for unauthorised payment transactions under Article 74(2) of PSD2. Only the payer’s and payee’s PSP may make a decision of whether or not to apply the exemption and the payer’s and payee’s PSPs apply this exemption based on their own fraud rate. Table 2 of this EBA Opinion also specifies that in the specific case of card payments, the payer’s PSP always makes the ultimate decision on whether or not to accept or apply an exemption. In the event that the payer’s or payee’s PSP have contractual arrangements with other entities, whether or not authorised or registered by a financial regulator, this remains the decision of the payer’s or payee’s PSP whether to apply an exemption and the reference fraud rate remains the fraud rate of the payer’s or payee’s PSP respectively.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2018_4035

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.