EBA · 2017_3349 Final Q&A

Clarification of the collateral amounts -validation rules v4759_m & v4774_m

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2017-06-16
Answered
2021-06-25
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Could you please clarify what amounts need to be reported in columns 150-210 of template C08.01, specifically, for ‘funded credit protection’ ‘real estate’ (column 190), when own estimates of LGD are used.

Background

Validation rules v4759_m & v4774_m indicate that in templates C08.01a & C08.02 column 090 ‘Exposure after CRM substitution effects pre-conversion factors’ should be more than or equal to columns 150-210 ‘Credit risk mitigation techniques taken into account in LGD estimates excluding double default treatment’. In the example where market value of the property exceeds the exposure amount, the above validation rule would not be met, unless the market value is to be capped at the exposure value. The instructions for template C08.01a (Annex_II of Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 - ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (as amended)) state that ‘when own estimates of LGD are used the amount to be reported shall be the estimated market value.’ In addition, Q&A 2016_2866 suggests the value reported should equal the market value of the property, which may exceed exposure.

Answer

The relevant amount of collateral which has to be reported in columns 150 – 210 of template C 08.01 respectively of template C 08.02 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting) shall be determined in accordance with the instructions on these rows provided in Annex II to the ITS on Supervisory Reporting. The amount of collateral taken into account for a specific exposure does not have to be capped at the exposure value of the exposure in question. In this regard, validation rules v4759_m and v4774_m have been deleted, as they did not fully reflect all possible situations. See also Q&A 2015_2010 for Standardised approach.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2017_3349

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Clarification of the collateral amounts

Answered 2017-02-03

Validations between F 13.01 and F 05.00

Answered 2017-11-17

Calculation of the amount reported for guarantees received on report F09.02

Answered 2023-06-30

EBA validations rules for 2.5 with reference v2708_m and v3091_ m

Answered 2017-11-17

Validation rules v4764_m, v4765_m, v4766_m, v4767_m and v4768_m in template C 08.01

Answered 2017-11-17

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.