EBA · 2017_3285 Final Q&A

Inconsistency between validation rules and ITS/CRR for C 07.00

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Consultancy firm
Submitted
2017-05-02
Answered
2017-07-28
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Why is there an inconsistency between the provisions of the CRR / the ITS on Reporting and several validation rules (e4891_n // e4894_n)?

Background

e4891_n states that for row 250, C 07.00, sheet 002 (Central Governments or Central Banks) should be 'empty'. However, the 250% risk weight bucket for Central Governments or Central Banks will be populated for deferred tax assets (the 250% risk weight based on this being 'other assets'). Furthermore, e4894_n states that for rows 140-170 and 190-280, C 07.00a, sheet 007 (Institutions) should be 'empty'. However, many of these rows will be populated for Institutions as the risk weight for these are not limited to just 20%.

Answer

Validation rule e4891_n will be corrected. The subject validation rule, as currently drafted, is misleading as regards the substantial treatment (and the consequent reporting) of certain exposures towards central governments as it incorrectly assumes that these exposures can never receive a risk weight equal to 250% (row 250 of template C 07.00 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting)). This, however, is not the case on the basis of Article 48(4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) and Q&A 2013_390 , according to which certain amounts of DTA may be subject to a risk weight of 250% and be reported in row 250 of sheets 002 (Central governments or central banks) or 003 (Regional governments or local authorities). For e4894_n, please see Q&A 2017_3237 .

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2017_3285

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

C 07.00, validation e4894_n (validations for v2.6)

Answered 2017-07-28

Inconsistency between CRR article 379 and validation rule V4894 (C 07.00)

Answered 2018-04-06

Inconsistency in validation rules v0532_m.

Answered 2014-04-04

Validation rule (taxonomy 2.6) e4902_n about the risk weighted exposure for Equity in CR SA

Answered 2021-03-19

Validation Rule on C 09.02 Template - V4787

Answered 2021-03-19

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.