Annex IV, template C 105.01, c060, interpretation of term "case weighted" in column 060 (Case Weighted average default rate for calibration)
- Regulation
- Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
- Article
- 78, para. 2
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
- Submitted by
- Credit institution
- Submitted
- 2017-02-07
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Question
Background
Answer
Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2017_3150
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
EBA Benchmarking 2016
Answered 2016-12-02
Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight
Answered 2019-07-26
Lines 290 to 320 of the CR SA’ state
Answered 2014-09-26
Issues related to para (89) of the EBA/GL/2017/16 with regards to the calibration procedure of the PD models to be conducted “after taking into account any overrides applied in the assignment of obligors to grades or pools”
Answered 2022-02-11
Consistency in the treatment of multiple defaults
Answered 2023-03-17
More Q&As on this topic
Weighted average of the CCF
Answered 2020-11-27
PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+
Answered 2020-11-27
Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types
Answered 2019-07-26
Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight
Answered 2019-07-26
EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)
Answered 2019-07-26
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.