EBA · 2016_2940 Archive

Annex V, Section 1: Market Benchmarking Portfolios. Definition of Portfolio 10 (IR)

Regulation
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Article
78, para. 2
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2016-10-13
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

We will use 16 October 2018 as start date for the swap and thus 14 October 2018 as maturity of the option. Please confirm that these dates are appropriate.

Background

In the definition for Portfolio 10 the option expiry date is 14 October 2018 and the maturity date of the swap is 13 October 2028. As current Market Conventions expects a two day settlement for the Swaption and 14 October 2018 is a non-trading date, we will use 16 October 2018 as start date for the swap.

Answer

In accordance with the first sentence of Annex V, Common instructions, point (r) of the Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on benchmarking) for the 2017-benchmarking exercise, institutions shall follow appropriate market conventions where not specified otherwise. With regard to portfolio 1.10 of Annex V, if the expiry dates respectively maturity dates have to be changed slightly due to market settlement procedures and / or non-working days, this should be stated and briefly explained in the appropriate free text box (c060) in template C 106.00 of Annex VII to the ITS on benchmarking for the 2017-benchmarking exercise.   DISCLAIMER: The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal. The text of the Implementing Regulation may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A refers.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2016_2940

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

For swaps should we consider that we have a collateral agreement with the counterparty?

Answered 2019-03-29

Clarification of columns 050 and 060 of template C 101.00, Annex I of the Benchmarking exercise.

Answered 2017-03-24

Clarification of the geographical scope of the benchmark portfolios

Answered 2016-06-24

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types

Answered 2019-07-26

Definition of low default portfolios for 2017 supervisory benchmarking exercise: Missing Portfolio ID for exposures assigned to both the exposure class ‘institutions’ and to the sector of counterparty ‘general governments’

Answered 2017-03-24

More Q&As on this topic

Weighted average of the CCF

Answered 2020-11-27

PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+

Answered 2020-11-27

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types

Answered 2019-07-26

Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight

Answered 2019-07-26

EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)

Answered 2019-07-26

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.