EBA · 2016_2919 Archive

Benchmarking portfolios: document clause for CDS

Regulation
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Article
78, para. 2
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2016-09-29
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Annex V portfolio 1.19 restructuring clause: FULL. However, we found "CR14" as the relevant document clause. Please clarify if we shall use doc clause CR14 instead. Annex V portfolios 1.21, 1.23. 1.26 Doc clause = MM. However, current market convention is MM14. Please clarify if we shall use doc clause MM14 instead.

Background

To enable booking of the portfolios for the benchmarking exercise the exact Doc clause used for CDS is required.

Answer

In accordance with the first sentence of Annex V, Common instructions, point (r) of the Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on benchmarking) for the 2017-benchmarking exercise, institutions shall follow appropriate market conventions where not specified otherwise. With regard to the document clauses for portfolios 1.19, 1.21, 1.23 and 1.26 of Annex V, where the instructions refer to a class of document clauses (‘full’ respectively ‘MM’), the applicable document (sub-)clause shall be identified based on current market practices and conventions.   DISCLAIMER: The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal. The text of the Implementing Regulation may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A refers.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2016_2919

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Clarification of the geographical scope of the benchmark portfolios

Answered 2016-06-24

Definition of low default portfolios for 2017 supervisory benchmarking exercise: Missing Portfolio ID for exposures assigned to both the exposure class ‘institutions’ and to the sector of counterparty ‘general governments’

Answered 2017-03-24

Clarification of columns 050 and 060 of template C 101.00, Annex I of the Benchmarking exercise.

Answered 2017-03-24

EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, credit spread instruments)

Answered 2019-02-01

For swaps should we consider that we have a collateral agreement with the counterparty?

Answered 2019-03-29

More Q&As on this topic

Weighted average of the CCF

Answered 2020-11-27

PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+

Answered 2020-11-27

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types

Answered 2019-07-26

Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight

Answered 2019-07-26

EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)

Answered 2019-07-26

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.