EBA · 2016_2861 Archive

Reporting of CCF values for FIRB

Regulation
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Article
78, para. 2
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2016-08-09
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Instructions on c100 of C 103 in ANNEX IV to the ITS state that institutions should report own estimates for CCFs. If the institutions apply the FIRB approach, they have to use regulatory CCFs. Further, in the case that there are no off-balance positions in the exposure no CCF is applied. Would it be correct to report regulatory CCFs if no own estimation is undertaken or should these cells be left blank? If no CCF is applied, should the cell be left blank or be filled with a 1cnot applicable 1d?

Background

Institutions differ in their way of reporting CCFs for FIRB exposures. Some leave the cells blank, other report regulatory CCFs.

Answer

Column 100 of template C 103.00 of Annex III of the Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on benchmarking) has to be reported also in case that the institution does not estimate CCFs on its own. In that case the regulatory one has to be reported if there are exposures on which this CCF is applied. The weighted average CCFs shall be reported. The weights that shall be used shall be the amounts to which the CCFs are applied in order to obtain the EAD.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2016_2861

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.