Clarifications on portfolio specifications & general instructions for Annex V
- Regulation
- Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
- Article
- 78, para. 2
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
- Submitted by
- Industry association
- Submitted
- 2015-10-21
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Question
Background
Answer
Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2015_2439
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
For swaps should we consider that we have a collateral agreement with the counterparty?
Answered 2019-03-29
Exchange rates in the template Roll-over of funding (C 70.00)
Answered 2015-12-18
Inconsistent wording/references between reporting templates and ITS
Answered 2014-03-28
Clarification of the geographical scope of the benchmark portfolios
Answered 2016-06-24
C69.00 – Time-periods covered by column set
Answered 2015-12-18
More Q&As on this topic
Weighted average of the CCF
Answered 2020-11-27
PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+
Answered 2020-11-27
Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types
Answered 2019-07-26
Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight
Answered 2019-07-26
EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)
Answered 2019-07-26
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.