EBA · 2015_2434 Final Q&A

Exclusion of “financial services” from the exemption from bail-in

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
44, para. 2, 3
Topic
Resolution tools and powers
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2015-10-20
Answered
2016-11-18
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Would the Commission agree that domestic legislation which excludes "financial services" from the exemption from bail-in retains this prerogative when implementing the BRRD?

Background

Article 44(2)(g)(ii) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) states the following: " Resolution authorities shall not exercise the write down or conversion powers in relation to the following liabilities whether they are governed by the law of a Member State or of a third country: [...]a commercial or trade creditor arising from the provision to the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of goods or services that are critical to the daily functioning of its operations, including IT services, utilities and the rental, servicing and upkeep of premises, " The non-exhaustive list of goods / services in the text are non-financial in nature and not mentioning financial services. Hence they can be interpreted as intended to apply to non-financial services when referring to "commercial or trade creditors". A creditor providing funding who is not a financial counterparty should be exempt from bail-in. It would be clearly problematic if a lender to an institution was exempt from bail-in on the basis that the relevant funding is deemed critical to the institution. Also, Article 1(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) permits to be 1dstricter 1d on institutions, hence it would be possible to clarify the above in domestic law.

Answer

Liabilities owed to firms in the financial sector must not be automatically exempted from bail-in, except where the claims relate to a liability described in Article 44(2), or when they fall under the exceptional circumstances described in Article 44(3). Article 44(2)(g)(ii) provides exemption from bail-in for liabilities to a commercial or trade creditor arising from the provision to the institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) of goods or services that are critical to the daily functioning of its operations, including IT services, utilities and the rental, servicing and upkeep of premises. This should not be interpreted as excluding liabilities which are critical to an institution’s funding needs. Rather this intended to capture creditors who provide goods or services of an operational rather than a financial nature. Disclaimer: This question goes beyond matters of consistent and effective application of the regulatory framework. A Directorate General of the Commission (Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union) has prepared the answer, albeit that only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide definitive interpretations of EU legislation. This is an unofficial opinion of that Directorate General, which the European Banking Authority publishes on its behalf. The answers are not binding on the European Commission as an institution. You should be aware that the European Commission could adopt a position different from the one expressed in such Q&As, for instance in infringement proceedings or after a detailed examination of a specific case or on the basis of any new legal or factual elements that may have been brought to its attention.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2015_2434

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.