Definition of the counterparty size in case of substitution approach application
- Regulation
- Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
- Article
- 78, para. 2
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
- Submitted by
- Credit institution
- Submitted
- 2015-09-30
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Question
Background
Answer
Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2015_2354
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types
Answered 2019-07-26
Clarification of columns 050 and 060 of template C 101.00, Annex I of the Benchmarking exercise.
Answered 2017-03-24
Use ‘AND’ or ‘OR’ rule to identify the exposure of the individual counterparties?
Answered 2017-03-24
Principles for completing template C 67.00 and C 71.00
Answered 2016-02-05
Substitution approach for exposure and guarantor under different approaches
Answered 2020-09-11
More Q&As on this topic
Weighted average of the CCF
Answered 2020-11-27
PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+
Answered 2020-11-27
Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types
Answered 2019-07-26
Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight
Answered 2019-07-26
EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)
Answered 2019-07-26
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.