EBA · 2014_878 Final Q&A

Scope for probation period

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99, para. 2
Topic
Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
Submitted by
Consultancy firm
Submitted
2014-02-25
Answered
2015-03-27
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Paragraph 176 defines the criteria to discontinue forbearance classification. According to paragraph 176 (b) "...a minimum 2 year probation period has passed from the date the forborne exposure was considered as performing". According to Annex II “EBA ITS 2013 03 Annex I (Annex I ITS FBE NPE Amemdments Annex III ITS reporting IFRS templates)” paragraph 176 (b) is only applicable to table 19 column 50 (of which: Performing forborne exposures under probation). Does this mean that the 2 year probation period is only required for exposures which are reported in column 50 – i.e. exposures with forbearance measures which have been reclassified out of the non-performing forborne exposure columns (see paragraph 180)?

Background

At the moment it is not clear whether the 2 year probation period is applicable only to forborne exposures that have been reclassified from the non-performing category or generally to all performing exposure with forbearance measures.

Answer

The two years’ probation period is applicable to all forborne exposures, irrespective of whether they were classified as performing or non-performing when the forbearance measures were granted:a) The probation period applicable to a performing exposure that was not classified as non-performing at the date the forbearance measure was extended or for which the forbearance measures have not led the exposure to be classified as non-performing begins at the date the forbearance measure was granted (paragraph 177);b) The probation period of a non-performing forborne exposure begins the day the exposure is qualified as performing (paragraph 176).The rules for non-performing forborne exposures in b) above are applied to performing forborne exposures reclassified out of the non-performing category (paragraph 176) and to forborne exposures reclassified as non-performing in application of paragraph 179, as the application of paragraph 179 interrupts the probation period of a performing forborne exposure (the scope of application of paragraph 179 is further specified in Q&A 2014_736). Although the probation period applies to all forborne exposures, according to paragraph 180 of Annex V of Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 – ITS on Supervisory Reporting of institutions (ITS), only those performing forborne exposures reclassified from the non-performing category and which are in the probation period (exposures under point b) above) shall be reported in column 050 of F 19.00. The content of column 050 of F 19.00 is further specified in Q&A 2014_736.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2014_878

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.