Inconsistency between taxonomy and ITS - report CR SA

In the taxonomy it seems that the cells from the following rows may be fed for all exposures classes (In the taxonomy the facts are "open" for the cells of the following rows ): - 020 : of which SME - 030 : of which : SME subject to SME-supporting factor - 040 : of which : Secured by mortgages ... But in the last version of the ITS (and also in the old one), the functional text mentions that those rows should only be displayed for some specific exposures classes (i.e screen shot below). Some of our customers think that, accordingly to the ITS, the following rows must be "closed" for non listed exposures classes like "Institutions", "central governments or central banks", "Covered Bonds" ... Indeed, for them those reporting SME details for an exposure on "central governments or central banks" is just functional non-sense. => May you confirm that rows "020" to "040" must only be reported for the exposure classes listed in the ITS? => If so, can we expect that a future version of the taxonomy will close the facts relative to those rows for the ITS unlisted exposure classes.

020 of which: SME This row shall only be reported for the Total and the exposure classes retail, corporate and secured by mortgages on immovable property All exposures to SME shall be reported here. 030 of which: SME subject to the SME-supporting factor This row shall only be reported for the Total and the exposure classes retail, corporate and secured by mortgages on immovable property. Only exposures to SME which meet the requirements of Article 501 CRR shall be reported here. 040 of which: Secured by mortgages on immovable property - Residential property Article 125 of CRR. Only reported in exposure class 'Secured by mortgages on immovable property'