EBA · 2014_1411 Final Q&A

Embedded forbearance clauses

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2014-08-01
Answered
2021-03-05
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Does it lead to a forborne status of the contract if executing embedded forbearance clauses (e.g. payment holiday and partial write off), incorporated in Dutch Nationale Hypotheek Garantie mortgages?

Background

In the Netherlands, Stichting Waarborgfonds Eigen Woningen (WEW) was founded by the government aimed at increasing private property. By means of a guarantee (Nationale Hypotheek Garantie) the repayment of Dutch mortgages was ensured. Measures that could be executed in case of troubled debt are payment holidays and partial write offs. Banks are therefore willing to offer a lower interest rate on these mortgages.

Answer

According to paragraph 243 of Annex V to Regulation (EU) no 680/2014 (ITS on Reporting), embedded forbearance clauses (clauses which, when enforced at the discretion of the debtor, enable the latter to change the terms of the contract), lead to the recognition of forbearance when the institution approves their use by a debtor that is assessed in financial difficulties. In this case, the triggering of such embedded clauses qualifies as a concession.   Paragraphs 252 and 254 nevertheless provide that the use of forbearance clauses embedded in the contract by a debtor who is under non-performing status or who would be considered as non-performing without the use of these clauses, mandatorily leads the forborne status. Furthermore, applying forbearance measures to debtors who are 30 days past-due or who would be 30 days past-due in their payments without the exercise of these clauses is a rebuttable presumption that forbearance as taken place.   The agreement to the use of embedded forbearance clauses when the debtor faces financial difficulties (evidenced in any case by a non-performing status, and presumably evidenced by a 30 days past-due status) is indeed similar to modifying the contract to improve the debt service ability of the debtor.   To summarize, exposures guaranteed by a Nationale Hypotheek Garantie shall be identified as forborne whenever this guarantee is executed for a debtor in situation of financial difficulties, or in situations covered in paragraphs 252 and 254. On the other hand, exposures guaranteed by a Nationale Hypotheek Garantie, whose clauses are not executed, or are executed for reasons other than the financial difficulties of the debtor or than situations in paragraphs 252 and 254, shall not be identified as forborne.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2014_1411

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.