EBA · 2013_538 Final Q&A

Definition of counterparty for the purpose of applying on-balance sheet netting

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
195
Topic
Credit risk
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2013-11-19
Answered
2014-06-06
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

1) What is the definition of a counterparty in the context of using on-balance sheet netting (OBSN) of mutual claims between the bank and the counterparty as eligible credit risk mitigation form? 2) In other words, to be eligible for OBSN should the netting of loans and deposits always be with one legal entity or can they be across legally connected entities (for example parent-subsidiaries)?

Background

From a risk management perspective a client can consist of a number of legal entities that are connected (for example parent-subisdiaries) and they can be treated as one counterparty with one rating. Certain cash management products are based on this principle and facilitate netting across these entities. For the purpose of calculating RWA, the question came up whether on-balance sheet netting is an eligible form of credit protection for loans and deposits in the name of several entities that are connected and where mutual liability or parent liability exists.

Answer

Article 195 of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 (CRR) limits on-balance sheet netting to mutual claims between an institution and its counterparty. The reference to claims makes clear that a parent undertaking and its subsidiary are different counterparties since claims contractually feature specific legal or natural persons. Consequently, a claim on a parent undertaking is not a claim on the subsidiary and vice versa. Accordingly, for the purposes of credit risk mitigation recognition, institutions have to identify one counterparty not in light of the institution 19s own internal  risk management framework, but rather taking into account the contract and the relevant applicable legal framework.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2013_538

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

On-balance sheet netting and exemption from the Large Exposures limits

Answered 2015-02-06

On-balance sheet netting and exemption from the Large Exposures limits - question 1

Answered 2015-02-06

Recognition of contractual netting of legal entities of a group

Answered 2015-09-25

Counterparties referred to in Article 428h (1) (c) CRR

Answered 2021-09-24

Counterparty Credit Risk

Answered 2014-03-28

More Q&As on this topic

Application of the currency mismatch treatment to self-employed individuals (natural persons carrying out an economic activity) under Article 123a CRR.

Answered 2026-07-31

Requirements for the purpose of treating exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property as duly secured from an RWA computation perspective under CRR Article 124(2) of the CRR.

Answered 2026-05-08

Use of credit assessments by ECAIs not in scope of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.

Answered 2026-03-13

US Hard test: adequacy of considering US charge-off rates corresponding to loss rates for exposures secured by residential property or commercial immovable property situated within the territory of the US

Answered 2026-02-27

Application of the SME definition in specific cases

Answered 2025-11-28

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.