EBA · 2013_191 Final Q&A

Consideration from residual values in the LCR calculation

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
425, para. 2
Topic
Liquidity risk
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2013-08-29
Answered
2015-03-27
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

As significant inflows from residual values of large portfolios of leased cars are not regulated within Part 6 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) how may institutions who professionally manage such portfolios take those values into account?

Background

While residual values from leasing contracts are explicitly dealt with in Article 134 (7) of CRR no equivalent rule is given for the LCR-inflows in Article 425 (2) of CRR. Banks with a significant car leasing portfolio (e.g. like captive banks) poses in depth market and expert knowledge to timely adjust the expected market values of the leased cars. These expected market values are verified in consideration of independent external market prognosis (provided for example by Eurotax Schwacke/Glass) on a monthly basis. Furthermore the last forecast of the residual value of each car is back tested by the actual market price to adjust the market valuation processes if necessary. Amendments in the expected market values result in an adaption of the residual value provision. Based on long-term contracts with used-car dealers the cars returned are evaluated and sold to those dealers, usually with no losses on the portfolio as provisions are set up conservatively. The consideration of the residual value would follow the premise to use conservative estimated residual values which reflect – if necessary – additional market uncertainty which is not fully covered by the prognosis of the independent external market prognosis.

Answer

Article 32(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 2015/61 provides that liquidity inflows be, inter alia , contractual in nature. The sale proceeds of the residual value of a leased car upon expiry of the lease are typically not contractually fixed and therefore such proceeds, even if conservatively estimated, cannot be taken into account as a contractual inflow. Liquidity inflows therefore can only be considered when the cars are effectively sold. Furthermore, the residual values of leased cars returned to the institution may not be considered to be HQLA.   DISCLAIMER This question goes beyond matters of consistent and effective application of the regulatory framework. A Directorate General of the Commission (Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union) has prepared the answer, albeit that only the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide definitive interpretations of EU legislation. This is an unofficial opinion of that Directorate General, which the European Banking Authority publishes on its behalf. The answers are not binding on the European Commission as an institution. You should be aware that the European Commission could adopt a position different from the one expressed in such Q&As, for instance in infringement proceedings or after a detailed examination of a specific case or on the basis of any new legal or factual elements that may have been brought to its attention.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2013_191

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.