EBA · 2013_105 Final Q&A

Treatment of existing Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
63, 490
Topic
Own funds
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2013-07-31
Answered
2013-12-13
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

This question is a supplement to Question 2013_46. For Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments with an incentive to redeem and quarterly/semi-annual/annual calls beyond the first call date, would these instruments qualify as Tier 2 capital if the issuer gave an undertaking to its regulator and the market that it would not exercise its call option for at least 5 years after the first call date? This would save the issuer the time and expense of having to modify the actual instrument documentation but would achieve a similar outcome in terms of its capital position/quality.

Background

Further clarification of Questions 2013_15 and 2013_46

Answer

An undertaking by the issuer to give up its call right does not change the regulatory treatment because the undertaking does not form part of the provisions governing the instrument. Please note that the grandfathering of innovative Tier 1 instruments is addressed by QA 15 .

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2013_105

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.