Introducing Verdandi: EU sustainability compliance intelligence anchored to official sources
Verdandi monitors EU sustainability regulation continuously and delivers personalised compliance intelligence anchored to adopted law, Commission proposals, and agency guidance. Here is what it does, who it is for, and why we built it.
The problem we kept running into
Every article in this series describes a version of the same situation. A business discovers that EU sustainability regulation applies to it, usually through a supplier questionnaire from an EU buyer, a news item about EUDR penalties, or a consultant’s introductory presentation. It tries to work out what it actually needs to do. It finds that the regulations are principles-based, that no official checklist exists, and that the interpretation continues to develop through Commission proposals, agency guidance, and consultations that most compliance teams have no systematic way of tracking.
The tools available tend to serve a different task. ESG platforms, carbon accounting software, and sustainability reporting management systems are built around the CSRD disclosure cycle. They help businesses produce the statement. They do not help businesses understand what the law currently requires, how that requirement has been interpreted, or how a proposal under consultation might change the obligation they are planning around.
Generic AI tools are faster to reach for but cannot be trusted for compliance use. They cannot tell you which version of a regulation they are drawing on, they do not distinguish between adopted law and a proposal that has not yet entered into force, and they have no access to the guidance documents and consultation outputs that are often where the substantive interpretation of a principles-based regulation actually lives. For a detailed treatment of why that matters, see why there is no official checklist for EU sustainability compliance.
Verdandi is our answer to that gap.
What Verdandi does
Verdandi monitors EU sustainability regulation continuously across five streams. Legislation covers adopted regulations, directives, and implementing and delegated acts in force: the binding text of EU sustainability law. Proposals tracks Commission proposals and trilogue documents, so you see legislation before it reaches the Official Journal. Guidance covers EFRAG Q&As and Commission FAQs: interpretive material on CSRD, ESRS and EU Taxonomy that establishes how auditors and enforcement authorities expect the standards to be applied. Consultations surfaces consultation papers and draft RTS/ITS from EFRAG, EBA, ESMA and EIOPA, which are near-certain to become binding law. Case law covers CJEU and General Court judgments interpreting EU sustainability regulation: binding judicial interpretation that national courts must apply.
Every document in the system is sourced from official EU publications and indexed with its provenance and status.
When a relevant development occurs, Verdandi surfaces it with personalised impact analysis: what the development means for a business with your specific profile, sector, and supply chain exposure. A palm oil trader and a steel manufacturer operating under the same broad regulatory framework face materially different implications when a Commission clarification on EUDR risk assessment methodology is published. Verdandi filters for what is relevant to your situation, not to the regulation in the abstract.
Users can also ask questions directly against the source documents. What does the adopted CSDDD text require in terms of stakeholder engagement? How does the Commission’s interpretive guidance on EUDR due diligence statements address smallholder supply chains? What did the consultation on CSRD sector-specific standards propose for companies in a particular industry? The answers are grounded in the specific documents that address the question, with the source visible and verifiable.
This is the same architecture as Forseti, which applies the same approach to EU financial regulation. Verdandi applies it to the sustainability regulatory stack.
Who it is for
Verdandi is built for the compliance-responsible professional at a business that cannot afford to misread what EU sustainability regulation currently requires.
That is a wide category. It includes the sustainability lead at a mid-sized Southeast Asian manufacturer whose EU buyers have started sending CSRD supplier questionnaires and who needs to understand what those questionnaires are actually asking for and on what legal basis. It includes the compliance officer at an Indonesian palm oil trader building an EUDR due diligence system who needs to track how enforcement guidance is developing as competent authorities begin applying the regulation. It includes the operations director at a European importer within scope of CSDDD who needs to follow the directive’s transposition across member states and understand how national implementing measures affect their supply chain obligations. It includes the in-house counsel at a company preparing its first CSRD sustainability statement who needs a reliable way to query what the ESRS standards actually require for a disclosure topic their external auditors are questioning.
The common thread is that these are professionals whose obligations are real, whose regulatory environment is still developing, and who need access to what the law actually says, in its current form, across the full range of sources where that meaning is established.
Why the source stack matters
Verdandi’s coverage spans five categories of source, and the distinction between them matters for compliance purposes.
Adopted law is the baseline. The EUDR as published in the Official Journal, the CSDDD as adopted, the ESRS standards as endorsed: these are the instruments that create binding obligations. But adopted law in the EU sustainability space is rarely self-executing. The CSDDD sets out a due diligence process at a level of abstraction that requires further specification. The ESRS standards specify disclosure requirements that reference methodologies not fully defined in the standard itself.
Commission proposals fill part of that gap prospectively. A company planning its compliance programme for 2027 needs to understand not just what the law requires today but what it is likely to require when proposals currently in the legislative process are adopted. Treating a proposal as though it were adopted law is an error. Ignoring proposals entirely is a different error, particularly for businesses making supply chain infrastructure investments with multi-year lead times.
Agency guidance is where the interpretation of principles-based regulation most often becomes concrete. EFRAG Q&As address specific questions about how ESRS standards should be applied. Commission FAQs develop the interpretation of CSRD and EU Taxonomy requirements in ways that go beyond what the adopted text specifies. These documents do not have the force of adopted law, but they establish the interpretive framework that auditors, enforcement authorities, and courts will draw on. A compliance programme that ignores them is building on an incomplete picture of what adequate compliance looks like.
Consultations matter for two distinct reasons. Some consultation outputs, particularly draft regulatory and implementing technical standards from EFRAG, EBA, ESMA, and EIOPA, are pre-legislative in form but near-certain to become binding law. A business making supply chain infrastructure decisions or designing a compliance programme with a multi-year horizon needs to understand what those drafts contain, not just what the adopted law currently says. Other consultations show where the interpretation is genuinely still open, and engaging with that material gives a compliance professional a better understanding of the interpretive landscape than waiting for the final output provides.
Case law is the fifth category, and the one most often absent from compliance monitoring tools. CJEU and General Court judgments interpreting EU sustainability regulation are binding on national courts and enforcement authorities. A judgment on how the EU Taxonomy’s do no significant harm criteria should be interpreted, or on the scope of EUDR due diligence obligations, shapes what adequate compliance looks like in ways that go beyond what the adopted text alone specifies. A compliance programme that treats adopted law and guidance as the complete picture is missing the judicial interpretation layer that sits above both.
A system that covers only adopted law answers a narrower question than the one compliance professionals actually need to answer.
What is live now
Verdandi launches with continuous monitoring across CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, CBAM, and the EU Taxonomy across all five streams. Legislation and case law cover binding material in force, including CJEU and General Court judgments interpreting EU sustainability regulation. Proposals and consultations give you visibility into what is coming. Guidance covers EFRAG Q&As and Commission FAQs that shape how auditors and enforcement authorities expect the standards to be applied in practice. The full list of instruments in scope is available on the platform.
Coverage expands as the regulatory landscape develops. CSDDD transposition by member states, CSRD sector-specific standards as they move through the legislative process, and EUDR implementing guidance as enforcement develops are all in scope for continuous monitoring.
Verdandi monitors EU sustainability regulation continuously and delivers personalised impact analysis anchored to verified official sources. Start for free.
Subscribe for news updates.
The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, as amended by Omnibus I in February 2026, applies to EU companies with more than 5,000 employees and 1.5 billion euros in worldwide turnover, with obligations from 26 July 2029. For companies sourcing from Southeast Asia, this means supplier mapping, risk assessments, due diligence plans, and contractual changes. This guide explains what is required and what it means in practice.